Thursday, August 19, 2010

Burn, Baby, Burn

September 4, 2007
By Patrick Grimm

In the spastic incantations of the Jewsmedia and from the mouths of the thug-like (and this description is almost an insult to thugs, who have far more scruples) agents of Big Jewry we hear of the horrors of the Nazis almost daily. Among the jaundiced accusations tossed at deceased Nazis by Jews is the horror, the fascist censorship represented by National Socialists who burned books. Like everything “historical” infested with Jewish fingerprints and molested by Jewish obtrusion, book-burning incidents by the Germans have been grossly exaggerated and hyperbolically played up by our Hebrew “friends” who now run America and most of Europe. Book-burning and book-banning are decried daily on the campuses of universities as the worst human rights violations, worthy only of a dictatorship. But like frequent accusations of racism and hate fired point-blank at others, we find predictably that Jews have always been the worst offenders. Not to put too fine a point on it, but most Jews do not believe in free speech. Anyone who has dealt with Zionist Jews in daily life can attest to this reality.

Jews are the present-day book-banners and book-burners. But at the very same time, their own “holy books” are the most anti-social and anti-Gentile documents ever penned by those sin-sifter wearers who somehow fall under the broad rubric of “religious leadership” and because of this, these noxious documents have also been put to the flame over the centuries, mainly because of their corrosive anatomy. And though the Talmud is no longer used to fuel bonfires, it remains a collection, an amassment of Jewish oral tradition that bristles with venom for non-Jews and rightly arouses the suspicions and raises the hackles of the awakened amongst the Gentiles.

But noting that the Babylonian Talmud is a greatest hits collection of hate for Goyim, hate for Christians and hate for Jesus Christ Himself does not clear away the fog and illuminate the query of “Why do Jews think they have the right to ban and burn the books of the Gentiles?” Thanks to the Canadian Jewish Congress and the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith Canada, Dr. David Duke’s books My Awakening and Jewish Supremacism have both been officially banned by the Canadian government since 2004 (read about it here). Canadian postal services are even allowed to incinerate Duke’s books if they are found and then send a bill for the torching to the individual who ordered the book/s/. No doubt this policy was enshrined in law with some under the table or blatant over the table (whichever the case may be) string-pulling by the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, a Jewish front group much like the countless front groups the Jews ran throughout the twentieth century in the United States, doing the secret dirty work for their allies in the Soviet Union from their nexus in both Hollywood and the print and TV media. They formerly operated through the New York/Moscow/Tel Aviv Axis of Evil that brave Jew Jack Bernstein warned us about in his brilliant booklets before he was assassinated by the Israeli Mossad. All of this (Jewish front groups and Jewish spying) is now confirmed by the Venona decrypts. Subtract Moscow from the equation and a picture of the present political arrangement begins to emerge.

There is no need to get sidetracked and pulled into discussion of the protracted list of Jewish offenses against their most altruistic host nation ever, America. Jews throughout all time and space have shown no more loyalty to the countries they have resided within than they have for the principles of honesty or charity, unless the recipient was a Jew. The Talmud clearly instructs Jews that the books of the Gentiles, meaning the New Testament of the Bible, must be destroyed. Israel Shahak, a Jewish activist for the human rights of the Palestinians stated in chapter two of his book Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years:

“It must be admitted at the outset that the Talmud and the talmudic literature - quite apart from the general anti-Gentile streak that runs through them, which will be discussed in greater detail in Chapter 5 - contain very offensive statements and precepts directed specifically against Christianity. For example, in addition to a series of scurrilous sexual allegations against Jesus, the Talmud states that his punishment in hell is to be immersed in boiling excrement - a statement not exactly calculated to endear the Talmud to devout Christians. Or one can quote the precept according to which Jews are instructed to burn, publicly if possible, any copy of the New Testament that comes into their hands. (This is not only still in force but actually practiced today; thus on 23 March 1980 hundreds of copies of the New Testament were publicly and ceremonially burnt in Jerusalem under the auspices of Yad Le’akhim, a Jewish religious organization subs subsidized by the Israeli Ministry of Religions.)” [1]

Ignoring the fact that this is the very state that many deluded evangelicals–one of which was referred to as a ‘corpulent conman’ in an online article yesterday (which was a nice touch)–urge us to finance with no qualifications, this passage from Shahak demonstrates quite fulsomely that radical Jews have no qualms about book-burning, a past-time supposedly only reserved for Nazi-like caricatures (a label almost everyone in this movement has been slathered with at one time or another). But the impulses of Jewish book-roasting and blacklisting goes a lot further than what some Jews in a Middle East terror state might engage in with religious gusto.

Let me tease you with another example of the totalitarian Jewish operational technique at work. Ariel Toaff, a Jew and an Italian-Israeli historian released a book called Bloody Passovers alleging that there were confirmed cases of Jewish ritual murder, an accusation always denied by Jews, but which has always cropped up again and again over the centuries. Without denying or confirming the research of Toaff, it is interesting to see the knee-jerk reflexive reaction of the world Jewish community and their wealthy spokesmouths in the propaganda halls of Big Jewry. A flurry of threats against professor Toaff, bellicose rhetoric and venom quickly followed.

The erudite and scholarly persona non grata to the hive mentality of Jewry, Israel Shamir tells us:

“Apparently, the Jews felt it and they attacked Toaff like maddened swarm. A renown Jewish historian, rabbi and a son of a rabbi, wrote about 500-year old events – why should they bestir themselves? In the Middle ages, use of blood, necromancy, black magic were not an exclusively Jewish realm. Witches and wizards of gentile background did it too. So just join the human race, warts and all! But this is too demeaning to the arrogant Chosenites.

These are firing words. Toaff came under strong community pressure: he was about to find himself at 65, on the street, probably without pension, without old friends and students, ostracized and excommunicated. Probably his life was threatened as well: Jews employ professional secret killers to deal with such nuisances. In the old days, they were called rodef, now they are called kidon, still as efficient as of old, and they were intercepted less often than bloodthirsty maniacs. His reputation would be annihilated: a Sue Blackwell would ‘consult her Jewish friends’ and call him a Nazi, an ADL-sponsored Searchlight would discover, invade or invent his private life, many small Jews in the Web would denigrate him in their blogs and in their flagship, the Wikipedia. Who would befriend him? Probably not a single Jew, and not many Christians.” [2]

This is the Talmudic intellectual atmosphere every scholar must face, whether Jew or Gentile, if they dare to swing a hammer against the false idol of the Self-Chosen People and their all-covering historical innocence of any and all moral offenses. But it doesn’t stop with these modest examples of Jewish iron curtain forbiddance and the black-balling of realities that make them shiver with discomfort, mainly because they are true or, in the case of Dr. Toaff’s book, could potentially or very likely be true.

The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume One has been banned in Canada and by booksellers Barnes and Noble and Borders. Why? Mainly because it shows that the slave trade in the US was run disproportionately by Jews, who even today have perfected white sex slavery to an artless art form in Israel.

Below is a list of just a few books banned by Jews across the world because they tell the truth about Jews and their nature. Isn’t it strange that they do this at the same time they create and sell the most graphic forms of hard-core pornography, some of it even involving children? The first two descriptions are taken from Zionist Wikipedia.

Did Six Million Really Die? By Richard Harwood - Banned in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Israel, and most of mainland Europe for ‘Holocaust Denial.’

The Turner Diaries By William Pierce - Book stores and libraries refuse to distribute it because of its racist theme.[9] Banned in Germany for its Nazi ideology theme and Pierce leadership in the American Nazi Party. Blamed for a number of crimes allegedly inspired by the novel.

Final Judgment By Michael Collins Piper - labeled as the most banned book in America, chiefly because it lays the blame for the JFK assassination right where it belongs: at the door of Israel and the Zionists

The Merchant of Venice By William Shakespeare - Eliminated from the high school curricula of Buffalo and Manchester, N.Y. (1931). A group of Jewish parents in Brooklyn, N.Y. (1949) went to court claiming that the assigment of Shakespeare’s play to senior high school literature classes violated the rights of their childrent to receive an education free of religious bias in Rosenberg v. Board of Education of the City of New York, 196 Misc. 542, 92 N.Y.Supp.2d 344. Banned from classrooms in Midland, Mich. (1980). Banned from the ninth-grade classrooms in Kitchener-Waterloo, Ont. until the Ontario Education Ministry or Human Rights Commission (1986) rules whether the play is anti-Semitic. [3]

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion - banned in countless countries because it is so dead-on accurate in its depiction of Jewish group behavior and can be confirmed by a simple reading of daily news events

Mein Kampf By Adolf Hitler - banned in Germany, Austria and New Zealand among other places, unless the book is used narrowly to condemn big, bad Nazis and to note the purity and sinlessness of the unblemished god-like behavior of the Chosen. The Jews are working hard to ban this book in Turkey as we speak. If Hitler was such an unreasoning monster and so utterly insane, why do Jews fear that people will read the writings of a madman? No, they are scared someone will see that many of Hitler’s views on Jewry conform to the reality they see right in front of their noses. As I often say ‘How could it be otherwise?’

Add to this list hundreds of anti-Zionist volumes and just about every book ever written and published on Holocaust revisionism and you have a pretty fair portrait of the draconian Jew censorship that stifles open inquiry and free thought. Yes, this is all Talmudically-inspired and yes much research and dissertation has been done that makes clear that fact. If the Nazis were fascist for one solitary book-burning and for banning certain Jewish books they felt to be subversive, then Big Jewry must be utterly neo-fascist and totalitarian, or if you prefer, Bolshevik, Marxist and Communistic. They were, are and probably forever will be all these things.

Again, most Jews, at least the organized ones, do not believe in freedom of speech for Gentiles. We know it, can prove it and their public record of activism circumstantiates the whole sordid palpability of Jewish obfuscation when truth comes on stage. It is appalling enough to recognize the hundreds of millions of people Jews have killed over the eons, far out of proportionate to their tiny numbers as an out-group. But their unalloyed intention to murder the countless truths of history is just as bad, and in some ways possibly even worse than their penchant for slaughtering Gentiles.




No comments:

Post a Comment